
My Journey in Curriculum Design and Evaluation
Welcome to My Curriculum Design and Evaluation Portfolio!
This portfolio is a comprehensive collection of my journey through the subject SME 604: Curriculum Design and Evaluation. Here, you’ll find a curated selection of my course experiences, outputs, and reflections. As you explore, you’ll discover a compilation of paper tasks that showcase my understanding and application of curriculum design principles. Additionally, I have included my reflective pieces that delve into the insights and learnings I’ve gained throughout this course.
This portfolio also features my future goals and aspirations, highlighting my vision for continuing to impact education through innovative curriculum design and thorough evaluation. I invite you to join me in this journey as I strive to shape effective and engaging educational experiences.
What is Curriculum?
Curriculum refers to the structured plan of educational experiences provided by schools or educational institutions to guide learning and development. It encompasses the goals, content, learning activities, and assessments that shape the educational journey of students. Through careful design and evaluation, a well-crafted curriculum aims to equip learners with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for their personal and professional growth. To delve deeper into the concept of curriculum, please watch the video below. 📚🎥
Psychological Foundations of Curriculum
Understanding the different psychological foundations of curriculum is essential for designing effective and meaningful educational experiences. Psychological theories and principles provide insights into how students learn, think, and develop. By exploring these foundations, educators can create curricula that cater to diverse learning styles, promote cognitive growth, and support emotional and social development. Additionally, knowledge of psychological foundations helps in the selection of appropriate teaching methods and assessment strategies, ensuring that the curriculum meets the needs of all learners. Integrating these insights fosters a more inclusive, engaging, and successful educational environment. 📚🧠
Behaviorism
Cognitive Psychology
Costructivism
Constructivism and the Different Learning Types
Phenomenology and Humanistic Psychology
Gestalt Theory and Maslow’s Self Actualization
Humanistic Psychology: Nondirective and Therapeutic Learning
My View of Curriculum in the Context of Development
The curriculum plays a pivotal role in shaping communities and fostering development by providing a structured framework for education. It guides the learning process, equipping individuals with the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to contribute positively to society. A well-designed curriculum addresses the needs of the community, promotes critical thinking, and encourages lifelong learning. It also supports social cohesion and empowers individuals to actively participate in civic life and economic growth. To realize more about the vital role of curriculum in community development, please watch the music video below. 🎓🌍🎶
Chalkboards and Change: The Evolution of Philippine Education Through the Ages

Indigenous Education System
Before the arrival of foreign colonizers, education in the Philippine archipelago was deeply woven into the fabric of daily life. In these early communities, learning was an organic process that occurred naturally within the family and tribal units. As Corpuz (2018) describes, knowledge flowed from one generation to the next through a sophisticated system of oral traditions, practical demonstrations, and communal activities. Children learned not in formal classrooms, but through direct participation in community life, where every interaction served as an educational opportunity.
The indigenous education system was remarkably holistic in its approach. Young learners acquired practical skills through careful observation and hands-on experience, guided by their elders in what anthropologists now recognize as an advanced form of apprenticeship (Delos Santos, 2019). This system ensured the preservation of crucial survival skills while simultaneously transmitting cultural values and social norms. Boys typically learned farming techniques, hunting strategies, and fishing methods, while girls were educated in the arts of weaving, food preparation, and household management. However, this gender-specific training was not rigid; there was considerable flexibility based on individual aptitudes and community needs.
At the heart of pre-colonial education was the ‘alibata’ or ‘baybayin,’ the ancient Filipino writing system. Fernando (2020) notes that this script was not just a means of communication but also a repository of cultural knowledge. Community elders used various mnemonic devices, including epic poems, songs, and proverbs, to encode and transmit complex information about history, agriculture, navigation, and spirituality. The babaylans, who served as spiritual leaders and community healers, played a crucial role in education, teaching not only religious practices but also medicinal knowledge and ethical principles.
This educational system, while informal by modern standards, was remarkably effective in ensuring the survival and prosperity of pre-colonial Filipino societies. It fostered a deep sense of community responsibility and cultural identity, while also developing the practical skills necessary for sustaining their way of life. The system’s success is evidenced by the rich cultural heritage that survived centuries of colonial rule and continues to influence Philippine society today.
Early Spanish Education (1521-1600)

The arrival of Spanish colonizers in 1521 marked a dramatic turning point in Philippine education. The Spanish regime introduced a formal education system that was fundamentally different from the indigenous learning practices, primarily serving as a tool for colonization and religious conversion. As Agoncillo (2021) explains, the early Spanish period saw the establishment of parochial schools run by Catholic missionaries, where the primary focus was on spreading Christian doctrine and the Spanish language.
This new educational paradigm represented a significant departure from the holistic, community-based learning of the pre-colonial era. The Spanish missionaries, while genuinely committed to education, approached their task with the dual objectives of religious conversion and cultural transformation. They established schools that taught reading, writing, and arithmetic, but always within the context of Catholic teachings. The encomienda system, which granted Spanish colonizers the right to collect tribute from the natives in exchange for their protection and religious instruction, had a profound impact on education access, creating a stark divide between the privileged and the marginalized.

middle Colonial Period (1600-1800)
The middle colonial period witnessed the emergence of higher education institutions that would shape the intellectual landscape of the Philippines for centuries to come. In 1611, the University of Santo Tomas was founded, earning the distinction of being Asia’s oldest existing university. This was followed by the establishment of Colegio de San Juan de Letran in 1620 and the Ateneo Municipal de Manila in 1859. As noted by Palma (2022), these institutions primarily served the elite class, particularly the children of Spanish colonists and wealthy Filipino families.
During this period, education became increasingly stratified. The sons of the native elite, known as the ilustrados, received privileged access to education, while the majority of the population had limited educational opportunities. The “Escuelas de Primeras Letras” (primary schools) were established, but their reach was limited, and the quality of education varied significantly between regions and social classes.
Late Spanish Period (1800-1898)

The late Spanish period marked a time of significant educational reform, primarily catalyzed by changing global perspectives and growing nationalist sentiments. The Educational Decree of 1863 stands as a watershed moment in Philippine educational history. This decree, as analyzed by Cruz (2020), established a free public education system and created teacher training institutions. The curriculum expanded to include reading, writing, arithmetic, Spanish, and Catholic doctrine, though the implementation of these reforms was often inconsistent and inadequate.
The rise of the ilustrados during this period had a profound impact on educational aspirations. These educated Filipinos, many of whom had studied in Europe, began advocating for broader educational access and reforms. The publication La Solidaridad became a powerful vehicle for these advocacy efforts, articulating the educational grievances and aspirations of the Filipino people. The nationalist movement, fueled by education, began to challenge the limitations and biases of the Spanish educational system, setting the stage for the dramatic changes that would come with the American colonial period.

American Colonial Period (1898-1946)
The arrival of American colonizers ushered in a revolutionary transformation of Philippine education. As Thompson (2021) chronicles, the most dramatic change came with the arrival of the Thomasites in 1901, a group of 600 American teachers who sailed across the Pacific to establish a new public education system. This marked the beginning of a systematic overhaul that would reshape the educational landscape for generations to come.
The American colonial government made education a cornerstone of their colonial policy, viewing it as a means of preparing Filipinos for eventual self-governance. English became the primary medium of instruction, a decision that would have lasting implications for Philippine society. The founding of the Philippine Normal School in 1901 and the University of the Philippines in 1908 signaled a commitment to building a comprehensive educational infrastructure (Rivera, 2019).
However, this period was not without its contradictions. While the Americans promoted democratic ideals through education, the system also served as a tool for cultural assimilation. The curriculum emphasized American values and history, often at the expense of Filipino culture and identity. Despite these tensions, the American period saw unprecedented growth in school enrollment and literacy rates, laying the groundwork for a modern educational system.
Post-Independence Period (1946-1972)

The achievement of independence in 1946 presented both opportunities and challenges for Philippine education. In the immediate post-war years, the focus was on reconstruction and rehabilitation of damaged schools. The US-Philippine Rehabilitation Act of 1946 provided crucial funding for this effort, allowing for the rebuilding of educational infrastructure devastated by World War II.
This period saw a conscious effort to ‘Filipinize’ education while retaining beneficial aspects of the American system. The Lopez (2018) study highlights how policymakers grappled with language issues, ultimately implementing a bilingual education policy that used both Filipino and English as mediums of instruction. This approach, known as the 2-2 Plan, reflected the complex linguistic and cultural landscape of the newly independent nation.
The post-independence era also witnessed a boom in higher education. Private colleges and universities proliferated, responding to the growing demand for tertiary education. However, as Gonzalez (2020) points out, this rapid expansion often came at the expense of quality, setting the stage for regulatory challenges that would persist for decades.

Martial Law Period (1972-1986)
The declaration of Martial Law by President Ferdinand Marcos in 1972 marked a significant shift in Philippine education. The regime emphasized technical and vocational education, aligning with its economic development goals. The New Elementary School Curriculum (NESC) was implemented, focusing on practical skills and civic education that often doubled as political indoctrination (Martinez, 2021).
During this period, the Ministry of Education and Culture underwent significant reorganization. The National College Entrance Examination (NCEE) was instituted, ostensibly to regulate admission to higher education institutions. However, critics argue that this also served to limit access to higher education, particularly for marginalized sectors of society.
Post-EDSA Revolution to K-12 Implementation (1986-2012)

The restoration of democracy following the 1986 EDSA Revolution brought renewed focus on education as a pillar of democratic society. The 1987 Constitution enshrined the state’s commitment to education, mandating the allocation of the highest budgetary priority to education. This period saw significant structural changes in educational governance.
The creation of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) in 1994 and the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) in 1995 represented attempts to streamline and specialize educational administration. The Department of Education, Culture, and Sports (DECS) was eventually reorganized into the Department of Education (DepEd) in 2001, focusing solely on basic education (Santos, 2019).

Modern Era: K-12 and Beyond (2012-Present)
The implementation of the K-12 Program in 2012 marked the most significant overhaul of Philippine basic education in recent history. As Garcia (2023) explains, this reform added kindergarten and two years of senior high school to the basic education system, bringing it in line with international standards. The Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013 provided the legal framework for this transformation, despite initial resistance from various sectors.
The latter part of the 2010s saw increased focus on technology integration in education. However, the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 forced an unprecedented rapid shift to distance learning, exposing deep inequalities in digital access and readiness. The Department of Education’s response included the implementation of various learning modalities: online, modular, radio, and television-based instruction (Ramos, 2024).
As of 2024, the Philippine education system faces several persistent challenges. The digital divide remains a significant concern, with many students, particularly in rural areas, lacking access to technology and reliable internet connectivity. Teacher training and professional development continue to be priorities, as educators adapt to new pedagogical approaches and technologies.
Recent initiatives focus on developing 21st-century skills while preserving Filipino values and identity. There is growing recognition of the need to balance global competitiveness with cultural preservation. Industry-academia partnerships are being strengthened to ensure curriculum relevance and improve employment outcomes for graduates (Lopez, 2024).

Looking ahead !
The future of Philippine education appears to be moving toward a more flexible, learner-centered approach. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence are being explored for their potential to personalize learning experiences. However, as Dela Cruz (2024) emphasizes, the challenge lies in ensuring that technological advancements in education do not exacerbate existing inequalities.
As the Philippines continues to navigate the complex landscape of 21st-century education, the lessons of its rich educational history serve as both guide and reminder. The journey from the indigenous learning systems of pre-colonial times to the digital classrooms of today reflects a continuing commitment to education as a pathway to national development and individual empowerment.
My Teaching Philosophy
Crafting your own teaching philosophy is a fundamental aspect of being an effective and reflective educator. A teaching philosophy serves as a guiding framework that articulates your beliefs, values, and approaches to teaching and learning. It helps you to define your purpose as an educator, clarify your educational goals, and align your teaching practices with your principles. By thoughtfully crafting your teaching philosophy, you can create a coherent and consistent approach to instruction that resonates with your students and fosters a positive learning environment. Additionally, your teaching philosophy can inspire and motivate you to continuously improve and adapt your methods, ensuring that you remain responsive to the evolving needs of your students and the broader educational landscape. 🌱📚
K-12 vs MATATAG Curriculum
The K-12 Curriculum is the educational framework used in the Philippines to provide students with 12 years of basic education, broken down into kindergarten, six years of primary education, four years of junior high school, and two years of senior high school. This curriculum is designed to improve students’ foundational knowledge and skills, prepare them for tertiary education, and provide pathways to employment or entrepreneurship.
The Matatag Curriculum, introduced by the Department of Education as part of ongoing K-12 reforms, aims to address gaps and improve quality in the Philippine education system. It places a stronger emphasis on essential competencies and student well-being, refines curriculum content to be more relevant and efficient, and integrates Filipino cultural values. “Matatag” means resilient or strong, underscoring a commitment to providing a more robust education system.
RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS
K to 12 Curriculum and Constructivism
Constructivism posits that knowledge is not passively received but actively built by learners as they engage with their environment. This philosophy prioritizes hands-on experiences, collaborative learning, and contextualized knowledge. Central to Constructivism is the belief that students learn best when they are actively involved in the learning process, allowing them to connect new information to their existing knowledge base.
The K to 12 curricula in the Philippines exemplifies Constructivist principles through its design and implementation. At its core, this curriculum aims to provide a holistic educational experience that prepares students for real-world challenges.
The K to 12 curriculum integrates project-based learning and collaborative tasks that require students to work together, fostering social interaction and critical thinking. For instance, group projects encourage students to share ideas, solve problems collectively, and engage in discussions that deepen their understanding. The curriculum emphasizes relevance by connecting academic content to students’ lives and communities. This is evident in subjects that incorporate local culture, history, and current societal issues, allowing students to see the practical application of their learning.
The K to 12 framework employs a spiral approach where concepts are revisited at increasing levels of complexity. This method enables students to build on prior knowledge, reinforcing their understanding and facilitating deeper learning over time.
By teaching foundational skills in students’ first languages during early education, the K to 12 curriculum supports constructivist principles by ensuring that learners can grasp complex concepts more easily before transitioning to English and Filipino as languages of instruction.
MATATAG Curriculum and Constructivism
The MATATAG curriculum builds upon the K to 12 frameworks with an enhanced focus on Constructivist principles aimed at addressing contemporary educational challenges. Launched as a response to the evolving needs of learners, this curriculum emphasizes active engagement and contextual relevance even further.
The MATATAG curriculum prioritizes not just academic skills but also emotional and social growth. It recognizes that learning is multifaceted and aims to nurture well-rounded individuals who can thrive in diverse environments.
Emphasizing critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills, the MATATAG curriculum prepares students for real-life challenges. These skills are developed through experiential learning opportunities that encourage students to apply their knowledge in practical situations.
The MATATAG curriculum focuses on making learning meaningful by integrating local contexts into lessons. This approach ensures that education is not only relevant but also resonates with students’ lived experiences, promoting deeper engagement.
By addressing diverse learner needs—including those from marginalized backgrounds—the MATATAG curriculum fosters an inclusive environment where all students can participate actively in their education.
The MATATAG framework encourages ongoing adaptation based on feedback from stakeholders, ensuring that it remains responsive to the changing educational landscape and societal needs.
COMPARISON
Both the K to 12 and MATATAG curriculums share the goal of providing quality education but differ significantly in their approaches. The K to 12 curriculum focuses on structured learning with an emphasis on foundational knowledge, while the MATATAG curriculum seeks to create a more flexible and holistic educational experience that prepares students for the complexities of modern society. The evolution from K to 12 to MATATAG reflects an ongoing commitment to improving educational outcomes in the Philippines. Below is a detailed comparison illustrating their similarities and differences.
| Feature/Aspect | K-12 Curriculum | MATATAG Curriculum |
| Implementation Year | Established 2012 | Launched in 2023, effective 2024-2025 |
| Focus | Structured and standardized education | Holistic and flexible approach in education |
| Core Subjects | Emphasizes core subjects like Math, Science, Language | Includes core subjects but integrated values education |
| Learning Approach | Spiral progression with a focus on foundational skills | Emphasizes critical thinking, creativity, and socio-emotional skills |
| Content Density | Initially criticized for being content-heavy | Aims to decongest the curriculum for focused learning |
| Inclusivity | Attempts to cater to diverse learners | Strong emphasis on inclusivity and equity |
| Real-World Relevance | Limited integration of real-life contexts | Strong focus on contextualized learning experiences |
| Assessment Methods | Standardized testing prevalent | More flexible assessment methods focusing on competencies |
| Educational Philosophy | Primarily essentialist with some progressive elements | Grounded in constructivism, progressivism, and essentialism |
EVALUATE
K to 12 Curriculum: Structure and Challenges
The K to 12 curriculum was introduced in the Philippines to provide a comprehensive education spanning from kindergarten through grade 12. Its primary objective is to equip students with essential knowledge and skills necessary for higher education and employment. The curriculum emphasizes core subjects such as Mathematics, Science, and Language Arts, aiming for a structured learning experience.
Strengths
- Standardization: The K to 12 curriculum offers a standardized framework that aligns with international educational norms, ensuring that students receive a consistent education across various regions.
- Extended Learning Duration: By extending basic education to 12 years, it allows for a more in-depth exploration of subjects, preparing students for global competitiveness.
Weaknesses:
- Curriculum Congestion: Critics argue that the K to 12 curriculum is overly dense, leading to an overwhelming amount of content that can hinder student engagement and understanding. Many educators have noted that the sheer volume of required competencies can be difficult to manage within the academic year (International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence, 2024)
- Implementation Issues: The rollout of the K to 12 curriculum faced significant challenges related to teacher training, resource availability, and infrastructure. These factors have impacted its effectiveness in various regions of the Philippines (Philippine Institute of Development Studies, 2024)
MATATAG Curriculum: A Holistic Approach
In response to the challenges identified in the K to 12 frameworks, the MATATAG curriculum was launched in 2023. This new curriculum aims to provide a more holistic educational experience that emphasizes critical thinking, creativity, and socio-emotional skills. It integrates principles of inclusivity and cultural relevance into its design.
Strengths:
- Holistic Development: The MATATAG curriculum focuses on nurturing not only academic skills but also values education and character development. This approach aims to produce well-rounded individuals who are prepared for societal challenges (International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence, 2024)
- Contextual Learning: By incorporating local culture and community issues into lessons, MATATAG fosters meaningful engagement and relevance for students. This contextualized approach helps students see the practical application of their learning (Cultural Responsiveness and Educational Equity Study, 2024)
Weaknesses:
- Initial Implementation Gaps: As with any new curriculum, initial implementation has revealed challenges such as varying levels of teacher preparedness and resource availability. Some educators have reported difficulties in adapting to new teaching methods (Philippine Institute of Development Studies, 2024)
- Assessment Concerns: Although MATATAG encourages alternative assessment methods focusing on competencies rather than rote memorization, there are concerns about ensuring consistency in evaluating student competencies across different schools (Developing an Evaluation Scale Study, 2024)
Summary
The Department of Education (DepEd) in the Philippines recently launched the MATATAG Curriculum as part of a renewed approach to K-10 education. This development follows concerns about the “overloaded” K-12 Curriculum, which educators and stakeholders found challenging due to an excessive number of learning competencies. This report provides a comparative analysis of the K-12 and MATATAG curricula, evaluating the objectives, structural changes, and intended outcomes of each approach.
The K-12 Curriculum was initially introduced to enhance students’ readiness for higher education, employment, and entrepreneurship. Spanning Kindergarten through Grade 12, it included subjects designed to ensure comprehensive learning, including a focus on language, sciences, social studies, and technical-vocational education. However, the curriculum was criticized for including an overwhelming 11,000+ competencies across subjects, which left limited time for teachers to deliver lessons effectively, often compromising students’ mastery of fundamental skills, particularly in literacy and numeracy.
The MATATAG Curriculum, introduced in 2023, aims to streamline and “decongest” the educational structure. By reducing the number of competencies from 11,000 to around 3,600, the new framework intends to emphasize foundational skills in reading, math, and socio-emotional development. This focus aims to support students’ cognitive progression while maintaining simpler, clearer learning objectives. Additionally, the curriculum minimizes separate subjects in early grades and consolidates them into core learning areas such as Language, Math, and Values Education, eventually phasing in subjects like Science from Grade 3 and other areas like Technology and Livelihood Education from Grade 4 onward.
The transition from the K-12 Curriculum to MATATAG reflects a strategic shift toward quality over quantity, where educational experiences are tailored to foster foundational skills, addressing previous gaps in literacy and numeracy. While initial feedback from pilot programs has been positive, with teachers and students reportedly receptive to the changes, the long-term success of the MATATAG Curriculum will rely on sustained support for teachers, ongoing evaluation, and refinement based on observed outcomes.
The MATATAG Curriculum represents a substantial step toward addressing longstanding issues within the Philippine educational system by re-focusing on essential competencies and foundational skills. The phased implementation allows for adaptive strategies in response to feedback, setting a promising precedent for education reform. While the MATATAG Curriculum is still in its early stages, its structured, focused approach has the potential to enhance educational outcomes in ways the original K-12 Curriculum could not fully achieve.
Crafting Our Own Curriculum
In our educational journey, we have been tasked with the exciting and challenging endeavor of crafting our own curriculum. This project is designed to showcase our ability to apply the concepts and theories we’ve learned in the course. By creating a curriculum from scratch, we demonstrate our understanding of educational principles, learning objectives, and assessment strategies. This task not only tests our knowledge but also hones our skills in curriculum design, allowing us to creatively and effectively address the diverse needs of learners.
Through this process, we are encouraged to innovate and think critically, ensuring that our curriculum is not only academically rigorous but also engaging and relevant. This project provides an opportunity to reflect on our teaching philosophies, integrate various psychological foundations, and develop a comprehensive plan that can positively impact educational outcomes. By completing this task, we prepare ourselves to become adept curriculum designers who can contribute meaningfully to the field of education. 📚✏️
Reflection
Reflecting on all the tasks we’ve completed throughout this course, I am struck by the depth and breadth of our learning experiences. Each assignment has provided a valuable opportunity to apply theoretical concepts to practical scenarios, allowing us to gain a deeper understanding of curriculum design and evaluation.
From crafting our own curricula to engaging in critical reflections, each task has challenged us to think creatively and analytically. We’ve delved into the psychological foundations of curriculum, explored various educational theories, and developed strategies to meet the diverse needs of learners. These tasks have not only enhanced our technical skills but also fostered our growth as reflective practitioners who can adapt and innovate in the field of education.
Moreover, the process of compiling our work into this portfolio has been a rewarding exercise in itself. It has allowed us to see the progression of our learning, recognize our achievements, and set future goals for continued professional development. Through these tasks, we’ve built a strong foundation that will guide us as we move forward in our careers, equipped with the knowledge and skills to make a meaningful impact in the world of education.
Future Goals and Aspirations
As I reflect on my journey through the subject SME 604: Curriculum Design and Evaluation, I am inspired to set ambitious goals and aspirations for my future in education. My primary goal is to continue deepening my expertise in curriculum design, staying abreast of the latest research and innovations in the field. I aspire to create curricula that are not only academically rigorous but also inclusive, engaging, and adaptable to the diverse needs of learners.
In addition to enhancing my curriculum design skills, I am committed to becoming a leader in educational evaluation. I aim to develop and implement effective assessment strategies that provide meaningful insights into student learning and program effectiveness. By doing so, I hope to contribute to continuous improvement in educational practices and outcomes.
Furthermore, I aspire to collaborate with fellow educators, researchers, and policymakers to advocate for and implement educational reforms that promote equity and excellence. I am passionate about creating learning environments that empower students to reach their full potential and become active, informed citizens in their communities.
Ultimately, my goal is to make a lasting impact on education by designing and evaluating curricula that inspire and support lifelong learning. I am excited to embark on this journey and look forward to the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead.
Resource List
Disclaimer: Some portions of this blog, including text and images, have been generated or enhanced with the assistance of AI tools, including Claude. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and originality of the content, AI-generated materials may not always fully reflect human expertise or experience. These contributions are intended to support and complement the overall theme of this blog. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us for clarification.
References
Developing an Evaluation Scale for Assessing the Effective Implementation of Matatag Curriculum in Philippine Public Schools. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence. Retrieved from JIP Publication.
Educational Transformation: The MATATAG Curriculum and Philippine Education Reform. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence. Retrieved from Rise Journals.
Cultural Responsiveness and Educational Equity: Exploring the MATATAG Curriculum in the Light of Sociocultural Theory. SSRN. Retrieved from SSRN.
DepEd conducts assessment of MATATAG pilot implementation. Philippine Institute of Development Studies (PIDS). Retrieved from PIDS.
Kilag, O.K., Borbajo, M.N., Uy, F., Malbas, M., Dela Cerna, Y.M., & Makiling, N. (2024). Strategic Curriculum Reform: The MATATAG Initiative and Its Potential to Elevate Philippine Education Standards. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence.
Acebuche, Y. (2023). DepEd rolls out ‘decongested’ curriculum. PhilSTAR Life.
Balancio, J. (2023). Adjusted K to 10 curricula launched: What’s in, what’s out. ABS-CBN News.
Bacelonia, W. (2023). DepEd: Teachers, learners ‘receptive’ to MATATAG Curriculum. Philippine News Agency.
Dela Cruz, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Education: Opportunities and Ethical Considerations. *Educational Technology Quarterly, 52*(1), 15-32.
Gonzalez, R. (2020). The Evolution of Private Higher Education in the Philippines. *Journal of Education Policy, 35*(4), 378-395.
Rivera, A. (2019). American Colonial Education and Its Impact on Philippine Society. *Historical Studies Review, 41*(2), 156-174.






























































































T